
Townhome community in Naperville, DuPage County.
A 48-unit attached-townhome community built 1998, governed under a Common Interest Community declaration with a five-member volunteer board operating under part-time management. During a derecho windstorm event, multiple shed roofs and a community-center awning detached and damaged three parked vehicles plus the patio of an adjacent unit. A maintenance report two years prior had flagged corrosion at the awning attachment hardware; partial repairs had been completed, with the remaining work documented as deferred in board minutes pending the next assessment cycle. The board had also received an accommodation request from a unit owner seeking emotional-support-animal designation that the board's prior architectural-rules subcommittee had treated as a pet-policy violation.
Read the declaration's common-area maintenance allocation and architectural-enforcement framework against the existing master policy and prior maintenance reports together. Identified that the deferred-repair pattern documented in board minutes created both a property-damage claim trigger and a separate D&O wrongful-act window. Reviewed the master policy general liability section, the D&O endorsement's wrongful-acts definition for breach-of-board-duty enforcement coverage, and the discrimination-defense extension scope under the Illinois Human Rights Act. Identified the pending accommodation-request handling as a parallel D&O exposure under IHRA's reasonable-accommodation framework. Sourced a renewal program with explicit deferred-maintenance review documentation, broad-form discrimination-defense extension, and updated architectural-guidelines aligned to IHRA accommodation procedures.
The master policy general liability section responded to the third-party property-damage claim with full defense and indemnity. The D&O endorsement received precautionary notice when one unit owner added a separate count alleging breach of board duty for the deferred-repair pattern; defense for the D&O count ran outside the indemnity limit. A separate IHRA accommodation complaint surfaced from the owner whose support-animal request had been treated as a pet-policy violation; the discrimination-defense extension responded with full defense, and the board engaged outside HOA counsel to update architectural-guidelines accommodation-handling procedures. The carrier conditioned renewal on documented attachment-hardware inspection and updated accommodation procedures. Volunteer director protections held.












