Washington CYBER INSURANCE SPECIALISTS

Cyber Insurance in Washington

My Health My Data-ready cyber coverage for Washington tech, healthcare, aerospace, and e-commerce operators — Patrick reviews contracts, vendor exposure, and ransomware terms before binding.

Get Cyber-Ready Coverage in Washington →

Takes ~2 minutes · We review your data profile · Coverage matched to your risk

A-Rated Cyber CarriersSecurity Controls ReviewEvery Policy Reviewed on VideoRansomware-Specific Underwriting

Case Studies

Cyber Insurance Case Studies

Anonymized examples of policy reviews we've completed for cyber-exposed businesses across Washington and other states.

Abstract editorial illustration representing healthcare data security
Healthcare

A Seattle behavioral health practice with an in-person clinic and a telehealth offering for substance-use treatment.

The Situation

A phishing attack against an intake clinician exposed mental-health and substance-use records for 2,800 Washington residents. Both data types fall squarely inside Washington's My Health My Data Act — which applies whether or not the practice is HIPAA-covered, and has no cure period.

What We Did

Privacy Liability funded class defense within days of the breach. Two consumers filed claims under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, the enforcement vehicle for MHMD (RCW 19.373) — exposing the practice to treble damages up to $25,000 per claimant. Data Breach Response covered notification.

🎯 The Outcome

The claims settled inside policy limits using rapid response and documented remediation. The AG inquiry resolved with a corrective-action plan. The practice updated its consent flows. This is the kind of behavioral-health incident we map against MHMD's consent posture before binding.

Abstract editorial illustration representing e-commerce data protection
E-Commerce

A Bellevue DTC fitness brand selling wearable-integrated coaching that captures heart rate, sleep, and recovery scores.

The Situation

A vendor compromise exposed biometric and physiological data for 22,000 Washington customers. All of it sat squarely inside MHMD's expansive definition of "consumer health data" under RCW 19.373.010 — which reaches fitness data, recovery scores, and inferences from device use.

What We Did

Privacy Liability funded class defense — MHMD's private right of action through the Washington Consumer Protection Act allows treble damages up to $25,000 per claimant. Regulatory Defense addressed the AG inquiry on consent posture under the AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking.

🎯 The Outcome

The class settled inside policy limits. The AG closed the file with documented consent updates. The platform came back online after a 24-hour rebuild. This is the kind of wearable-data scenario we map against MHMD's consent and processor framework before binding.

Abstract editorial illustration representing SaaS infrastructure security
Tech / SaaS

A Seattle B2B SaaS company providing patient-engagement infrastructure to telehealth platforms across the West Coast.

The Situation

Their API gateway got compromised. Reproductive-health and mental-health data for 19,000 Washington residents got exposed across multiple downstream clients. Under the Washington AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking, downstream data handlers face independent enforcement risk under MHMD (RCW 19.373).

What We Did

Network Security Liability funded the downstream client defense work. Privacy Liability addressed the consumer-direct claims under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, which provides treble damages and attorney's fees. There was no cure period to lean on — immediate enforcement was the operating reality.

🎯 The Outcome

Claims settled inside policy limits. The AG inquiry resolved with documented vendor-management updates. The downstream telehealth clients got their own defense costs covered. This is the kind of B2B health-tech incident we map against MHMD's downstream-handler framework before binding.

Bobby Friel, Partner at Direct Insurance Services

Bobby Friel

Partner, Direct Insurance Services

You know how it is — you're running the practice, you're seeing patients, you're managing your telehealth platform and your intake software, and you don't have time to wonder if your cyber policy was built for Washington or for some other state. You assume your privacy liability covers an MHMD private-action class under the Washington Consumer Protection Act. You assume there's a cure period that gives you time to remediate before a claim hits. You assume your downstream processors are covered when their breach becomes your breach. And then a class action gets filed under MHMD with treble damages stacking up to $25,000 per claimant, or a vendor breach activates downstream-handler liability under the AG's 2025 rulemaking, and suddenly you're learning what the policy actually does under Washington's rules. What we do is map your Washington patient count, your consumer-health-data definitions, and your processor agreements to the policy language — before you bind, before a class action gets served, before the AG opens an inquiry. On video. So you know exactly what your cyber policy will and won't do under Washington's framework. What's your current cyber policy doing for MHMD private-action class defense and downstream processor liability right now?

When was the last time anyone read your cyber policy's warranty schedule against your actual security controls and vendor stack?

📝 Helpful to Have

What Helps Us Build the Right Cyber Policy For You

The more we know about your data footprint, vendor stack, security controls, and regulatory profile, the more precisely we can match coverage to your real exposure. Here's what helps — but if you don't have it all, we'll work through it together.

Current cyber policy declaration pageShows your existing limits, sub-limits, warranties, and endorsements
Active customer MSAs or BAAs with cyber clausesCyber requirements from your largest customers or healthcare partners that drive coverage minimums
Vendor and processor inventoryYour third-party SaaS, hosting, payment, marketing, and analytics vendors — the dependent systems your policy needs to reach
Security controls overviewMFA coverage, EDR deployment, email filtering, backup architecture (online + offline), incident response plan status
Annual revenue and record countRevenue tier and approximate count of personal records held — both drive carrier rating
Data classification snapshotWhat sensitive data types you actually hold (PII, PHI, payment cards, biometric, IP) and roughly how many records each
Loss runs (last 5 years)Prior cyber claims, incident history, and any open matters
Contact info to send optionsEmail and best phone for the video walkthrough
Start a Cyber Review →

We walk through these on the call — bring what you have

Coverage Lines

Cyber Coverage in Washington

A complete cyber program combines first-party response and third-party liability. Here's how we build it for Washington healthcare, e-commerce, and tech businesses.

ESSENTIAL

Data Breach Response

  • Forensic investigation to determine scope and root cause
  • Breach coach and privacy counsel retention
  • Notification letters, call center, credit monitoring

Covers the cost of investigating, containing, and notifying affected parties after a breach. Washington's breach notification framework (RCW 19.255) requires notification of WA residents without unreasonable delay; the My Health My Data Act (MHMD, RCW 19.373, effective March 31, 2024) adds heightened obligations for any entity handling consumer health data. Coverage includes forensics, breach counsel, notification production and mailing, call center, and credit monitoring. For Seattle and Bellevue tech operators, this integrates with the AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking that expanded MHMD downstream-handler exposure. For Spokane and Tacoma healthcare practices, MHMD applies whether or not the entity is HIPAA-covered — meaning notification obligations may exceed HIPAA's. There is no cure period under MHMD; immediate enforcement is the operating reality.

CRITICAL

Cyber Extortion & Ransomware

  • Ransom negotiation with specialized firms
  • Decryption key purchase (where legally permissible)
  • System restoration and data recovery

Covers ransom-payment evaluation, negotiation, forensic response, and recovery costs when threat actors deploy ransomware or extortion-based attacks. Washington's MHMD (RCW 19.373) creates one of the most consequential ransomware exposure profiles nationally: any entity handling consumer health data — broadly defined to include reproductive, mental, substance-use, biometric, and inferred health data — faces a private right of action under the Washington Consumer Protection Act with treble damages up to $25,000 per claimant plus attorney's fees. There is no cure period. Coverage funds expert ransom-payment analysis, digital forensics, decryption tooling, and operational recovery. For Seattle behavioral health practices and Bellevue fitness/wearable brands, ransomware response coordinates with both HIPAA and MHMD exposure. The 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking means downstream handlers face direct exposure too. Includes law enforcement, breach counsel, and OFAC coordination.

OFTEN OVERLOOKED

Business Interruption (Cyber)

  • Lost revenue during system outage
  • Extra expense to restore operations quickly
  • Waiting period / retention specific to cyber events

Covers lost income and reasonable extra expense when a cyber event shuts down your operations. Most standard business-interruption policies exclude cyber-triggered outages — cyber-specific BI is essential for healthcare practices, e-commerce, and SaaS operators that lose revenue the moment systems go down. Washington operators face a layered downtime profile: Seattle and Bellevue tech and behavioral-health operators face MHMD obligations (RCW 19.373) with no cure period; healthcare integrates with HIPAA's 60-day notification clock; e-commerce faces PCI-DSS recovery windows. The MHMD private right of action under WCPA means class plaintiffs can file within days of an outage if consumer health data is implicated. Coverage includes lost revenue during recovery, reasonable costs to restore operations, and BI from ransomware lockups or third-party service-provider failures. Contingent BI from third-party processors is particularly material given MHMD's downstream-handler exposure.

ESSENTIAL

Network Security Liability

  • Third-party claims from compromised customer data
  • Vendor and partner downstream liability
  • Malware transmission claims

Covers third-party claims arising from a failure of your network security — including transmitted malware, unauthorized access through your systems to a customer's data, denial of customer service, and contamination of customer data. Washington's MHMD Act (RCW 19.373) creates direct downstream liability under the AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking — SaaS providers and other downstream data handlers face independent enforcement risk separate from primary collectors. The Washington Consumer Protection Act provides treble-damages private actions up to $25,000 per claimant plus attorney's fees for MHMD violations. For Seattle B2B health-tech SaaS providers serving telehealth platforms, network security liability addresses downstream customer claims and direct MHMD exposure. Coverage includes defense costs and settlements for direct customer claims, MHMD-specific WCPA private actions, and AG inquiries.

ESSENTIAL

Privacy Liability

  • MHMDA / HIPAA violation defense
  • Class-action and private-right-of-action defense
  • Regulatory investigation response

Covers liability arising from unauthorized collection, use, or disclosure of personal data. Washington's My Health My Data Act (RCW 19.373, effective March 31, 2024) is the most consequential health-data privacy law in the country — broader than HIPAA, applicable to any entity collecting consumer health data, with a private right of action through the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Treble damages up to $25,000 per claimant plus attorney's fees. There is no cure period. The "consumer health data" definition reaches reproductive health, mental health, substance use, biometric markers, fitness and recovery data, and inferences drawn from device and app usage. The AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking expanded liability to downstream handlers. Coverage addresses gaps in standard commercial general liability and includes WCPA-specific defense, settlement costs, and AG inquiry response.

RECOMMENDED

Regulatory Defense & Penalties

  • Washington AG investigations (MHMDA / CPA)
  • HIPAA / OCR investigations for healthcare
  • FTC and state-consumer-protection inquiries

Covers legal defense costs and civil penalties from Washington Attorney General investigations and enforcement actions under the My Health My Data Act (RCW 19.373, effective March 31, 2024) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86). MHMD has no cure period; immediate enforcement is the operating reality. The AG's 2025 vendor/processor rulemaking expanded the enforcement framework to downstream handlers. Civil penalties under WCPA are not capped per violation in the same way as other states; the AG can pursue injunctive relief and substantial penalty awards. Federal regulators add layered exposure: HHS/OCR for HIPAA-covered entities (where MHMD obligations exceed HIPAA), FTC § 5 for unfair-data-security claims. Coverage funds investigative defense, settlement costs, civil penalties where permitted, and the multi-regulator coordination MHMD incidents typically trigger.

Your Washington Cyber Reality

Landscape, Laws & Live Threats

Four angles on what shapes cyber underwriting and regulatory exposure for Washington businesses.

The Cyber Insurance Landscape in Washington

Washington's economy is anchored by the Seattle–Bellevue tech megacluster (cloud, e-commerce, gaming, AI), aerospace (Boeing / Everett), healthcare systems statewide, and a growing life-sciences base in Seattle. Major cloud and e-commerce HQs hold enormous amounts of consumer and B2B data; attackers target these operators continuously. Washington healthcare networks process significant PHI, and the state's recent My Health My Data Act dramatically expanded consumer-health-data protections. Washington's maritime, logistics, and agricultural-tech sectors add further attack surface.

Seattle–Bellevue (Cloud / Tech / Health-Tech)
Puget Sound (Aerospace / Manufacturing)
Spokane & Eastern WA
Tacoma–Olympia (Healthcare / Government)
Vancouver (Portland Metro / Healthcare)
Every Washington Region

Every Washington Region

We look at four things regardless of region: data volume, vendor stack, customer geography, and regulatory load. Your zip code is one input, not the whole picture.

Risk Calculator

Want to Know Your Washington Cyber Risk Profile?

Our Risk Calculator surfaces the biggest gaps in 60 seconds — no email required.

Cyber Risk Calculator

Check Your Washington Cyber Risk in 60 Seconds

10 questions, ~6 seconds each. Surfaces ransomware coverage gaps, vendor breach exposure, privacy law alignment, and business interruption waiting periods.

What it surfaces

Ransomware

Sub-limits, MFA warranty

Vendor breach

Dependent system coverage

Privacy law

CCPA, BIPA, statute exposure

Business interruption

Waiting periods, hourly cost

Sample question · 1 of 10~6 sec each

Does your cyber policy explicitly cover ransomware payments — and at what limit?

Yes, at full aggregate limit
Yes, but sub-limited (25–50%)
No / Not sure

Live calculator scores your answers and flags coverage gaps at the end — no email required.

Did you know? Cyber claims average mid-six-figures — often six-figure out-of-pocket when coverage is misaligned.

FreeNo email required60 seconds10 questions

Policy Mistakes We Find

8 Cyber Policy Mistakes That Cost Washington Businesses

These are the gaps we find in almost every cyber policy review. How many apply to yours?

1

🔐 Does your cyber policy actually cover ransomware — or is it sub-limited and conditioned on controls you may not have?

Most carriers now sub-limit ransomware at 25%–50% of aggregate and warrant MFA, EDR, and offline backups. If your controls don't match the warranty, a claim can be denied. When was the last time your agent walked through the ransomware endorsement with you?

2

💸 What happens if your BEC loss is excluded because you didn't have the social engineering endorsement?

Standard crime excludes voluntary transfers based on deception. Cyber often sub-limits or excludes social engineering without a specific endorsement. BEC losses average mid-six-figures — is the endorsement in place?

3

⏸️ Does your business interruption trigger for cyber events, or only for physical damage?

Your standard BI almost certainly excludes cyber-triggered outages. Cyber BI has its own waiting period, retention, and dependent-system extensions. For e-commerce, SaaS, and healthcare, downtime is the biggest loss.

4

🔗 If your vendor breach leaks customer data, who's on the hook for notification costs?

You're typically the data owner responsible for notification, even when a vendor caused the breach. Does your policy include dependent system coverage? Have your vendor contracts allocated breach responsibility?

5

⚖️ Has anyone mapped your state privacy law exposures to your policy language?

CCPA, VCDPA, TDPSA, CPA, BIPA, My Health My Data, TIPA — statutes vary by state. Your privacy liability wording may or may not align with the laws that apply to your customers.

6

📅 Does your policy's retroactive date cover claims from incidents already in flight?

Cyber claims surface months or years after the incident. Resetting your retroactive date on renewal can strip away years of silent coverage. Most businesses never check this.

7

👩‍⚖️ What happens when your panel-counsel clause prevents you from using your preferred breach lawyer?

Many cyber policies require you to use the carrier's panel counsel when a breach hits. Panel counsel is often fine, but you should know the restriction exists before binding.

8

⏱️ If your cyber BI waiting period is 12+ hours, what's your actual business continuity cost?

For high-volume e-commerce or SaaS, 12 hours of downtime is already six figures of lost revenue — revenue the policy won't touch. We review waiting periods against your hourly revenue.

Before You Decide

Things You're Probably Wondering

We're mid-term on our cyber policy — do we have to wait for renewal?

Not always. If there's a meaningful gap (sub-limited ransomware, missing social engineering endorsement, a regulatory exposure your wording doesn't cover, a vendor breach extension you don't have), it can be worth canceling mid-term and rewriting. We walk you through the math on whether the unearned premium refund and new policy cost make sense. If renewal's only 90 days out, usually wait. If it's 9 months out and a customer's MSA just rejected your coverage language, often worth moving now.

How fast can we have coverage in place?

Most reviews wrap in 3-7 business days from first conversation to bound coverage. The faster end of that range happens when your quote submission is thorough — current dec page, an MSA or BAA you're trying to satisfy, a vendor inventory ready upfront, and a security controls overview (MFA deployment, EDR, backup architecture). The longer end is when we're chasing details one piece at a time. For SaaS companies waiting on cyber clearance to close an enterprise contract, we work to whatever date the contract requires. We don't rush the warranty review, but we don't drag one either.

What happens when a customer pushes back on our cyber coverage during their security review?

You forward us the customer's cyber requirements and the security questionnaire. We compare what they're asking for against your policy's actual wording, push the carrier for endorsement adjustments where the gap is real, and reissue a corrected COI or send the customer a coverage breakdown that matches their schedule. Most pushback traces to one or two specific endorsement details — once you know which ones, the fix is usually fast and the contract doesn't get held up.

Bobby Friel, Partner at Direct Insurance Services

Bobby Friel

Partner, Direct Insurance Services

Video Walkthrough

See How We Review Cyber Coverage

Watch Patrick walk through a real commercial policy review on video — so you know exactly what you're buying before you commit.

Why Us

Why Washington Businesses Choose Us for Cyber

Data & Vendor Profile Review

We map your data, vendors, and regulatory exposure to policy language before quoting.

Video Coverage Walkthrough

We walk through warranty language, sub-limits, and endorsements so you understand what you're buying.

Multi-Market Cyber Access

Appointed with specialty cyber carriers that write healthcare, e-commerce, and tech risk at competitive terms.

Contract & Control Review

We review MSAs, BAAs, vendor contracts, and your security controls against Washington regulatory and policy warranty requirements.

Future Pacing

What Happens After You Have The Right Coverage

Once your cyber policy actually matches your data footprint, vendor stack, and regulatory exposure, security reviews stop being a panic. Customer MSAs don't stall because your coverage language doesn't quite match. Your enterprise sales cycle moves faster because your insurance documentation clears compliance on first submission. Your vendor risk reviews come back clean because dependent system extension and breach notification allocation are already in your policy. And when a real cyber event hits — a vendor breach, a BEC attempt, a ransomware demand — you're not finding out at the worst moment that the warranty schedule on your policy doesn't match the controls you actually had in place.

  • Customer MSAs and BAAs clear cyber security review on first submission
  • Vendor breaches trigger clean dependent-system response with no coverage surprises
  • Ransomware sub-limits, BI waiting periods, and warranty conditions match your actual operational reality
  • Renewal review starts 90 days out with no last-minute scrambles or carrier non-renewal surprises
5-Star Rated on Google — Policies Serviced by Direct Insurance Services

I run a snow plow removal business and my old insurance provider dropped my coverage!! They got everything sorted out and I was insured the same day. These guys know how to help, use them!!

Jessica K., Google Review

Carrier Partners

Carriers We Work With

We compare quotes from multiple A-rated cyber carriers to find Washington businesses the right coverage and price.

Travelers cyber insurance carrier logo
Chubb cyber insurance carrier logo
The Hartford cyber insurance carrier logo
Liberty Mutual cyber insurance carrier logo
AIG cyber insurance carrier logo
CNA cyber insurance carrier logo
Nationwide cyber insurance carrier logo
RLI cyber insurance carrier logo
Amwins cyber insurance carrier logo
Travelers cyber insurance carrier logo
Chubb cyber insurance carrier logo
The Hartford cyber insurance carrier logo
Liberty Mutual cyber insurance carrier logo
AIG cyber insurance carrier logo
CNA cyber insurance carrier logo
Nationwide cyber insurance carrier logo
RLI cyber insurance carrier logo
Amwins cyber insurance carrier logo

Plus additional specialty cyber carriers we're appointed with for healthcare, e-commerce, and tech-specific risk.

🗺️ Multi-Market Reach

Washington breach notification rules shape carrier appetite differently — multi-market shopping matches your cyber exposure to the right paper.

Cyber carriers underwrite state-specific breach notification timelines, state attorney general enforcement posture, and state regulatory exposure differently. We shop your specific data footprint, your vendor stack, and your incident-response posture across multiple carrier markets — so the cyber paper backing your business actually fits Washington's framework, not a generic policy bound off a multi-state template.

Real-World Cases

Real-World Washington Cyber Scenarios

Illustrative cases showing how cyber insurance responds when incidents hit.

Seattle Health-Tech MHMDA Class Action

A Seattle health-tech operator was sued under MHMDA for allegedly sharing consumer health data without proper consent. Private right of action under the WA Consumer Protection Act drove settlement exposure.

Case study: $3.2M class-action settlement; defense and partial settlement covered under privacy liability.

Bellevue SaaS Vendor Breach

A Bellevue B2B SaaS operator was breached via a compromised integration. Downstream multi-state and MHMDA-adjacent notifications cascaded across customers.

Case study: $2.8M in downstream notification and third-party liability.

Spokane Healthcare Ransomware

A Spokane-area healthcare provider was hit by ransomware. Attackers encrypted EHR and exfiltrated PHI. HIPAA, MHMDA, and Washington breach notification obligations triggered simultaneously.

Case study: $2.4M total insured response including BI, forensics, and regulatory defense.

The Complete Cyber Insurance Guide

Insurance Service 365

Want to Go Deeper?

Read the Complete Cyber Insurance Guide

A comprehensive 5,000-word guide covering the 6 core cyber policies, 8 mistakes we find in every review, state privacy law overview (CCPA, BIPA, MHMD), and a real incident case study.

  • The 6 core cyber policies — when each one triggers
  • 8 mistakes we find in nearly every cyber policy review
  • State privacy law overview (CCPA, BIPA, MHMD, more)
  • Real incident case study — start to bind
Read the Full Guide →

~5,000 words · 15 min read

Frequently Asked

Washington Cyber Insurance FAQs

MHMDA applies broadly to any entity that processes "consumer health data" related to Washington consumers — far beyond HIPAA-covered entities. Wellness apps, fitness platforms, mental-health operators, reproductive-health services, and many digital-health tools fall within scope. MHMDA requires explicit consent for collection/sharing and allows private-right-of-action enforcement under the Consumer Protection Act.

WA cyber pricing depends on industry, record count, revenue, security controls, and prior incident history. Cloud/tech, health-tech, healthcare, and aerospace operators underwrite at the higher end — with MHMDA exposure actively tightening the market for anyone handling consumer health data. Our Risk Calculator walks through the factors, and Patrick reviews every quote against multiple A-rated cyber carriers.

Yes, but with sub-limits, co-insurance, and security-control preconditions. WA policies commonly require MFA, EDR, offline backups, and a documented IR plan. We review ransomware terms on every policy before binding.

Yes — especially for WA real estate, law, and professional-services firms. Standard crime policies exclude voluntary transfers based on deception; cyber policies often sub-limit this coverage.

RCW 19.255 requires notification within 30 days of discovery. Washington AG notice is required for 500+ affected residents. MHMDA, HIPAA, and contractual obligations may layer on. Cyber policies fund the forensics and notification process.

Regulatory defense costs are insurable in Washington. Civil penalties and MHMDA private-action exposure may be insurable where state and federal law permit — this varies by statute and is actively contested for MHMDA. Most cyber policies cover HIPAA/OCR defense and some penalty categories; we review each policy's MHMDA wording carefully.

Washington's My Health My Data Act (Wash. Rev. Code §19.255.010 et seq., effective March 31, 2024) is structurally the most consequential health-data law in the country, and the most dangerous from a litigation perspective. MHMD applies to every entity collecting "consumer health data" of Washington residents — defined to include health records, genetic data, biometric data, reproductive and mental health data, substance use, and even device or app data revealing health status. The breadth captures health apps, wearables, and behavioral data well beyond HIPAA's covered-entity universe. MHMD includes a private right of action with treble damages — actual damages may be trebled up to $25,000 per violation, plus attorney's fees — and a separate $7,500 civil penalty cap per Washington Consumer Protection Act violation. There is no cure period. Combined, that math turns a single class action into seven- or eight-figure exposure. The Washington Attorney General's 2025 vendor and processor rulemaking extended liability downstream. Your cyber policy's privacy liability coverage has to explicitly contemplate MHMD treble damages. We verify before binding.

Washington's breach framework (Wash. Rev. Code §19.255.010, integrated with MHMD breach provisions) requires notification "as expeditiously as possible and without unreasonable delay" — operationally a 30-day benchmark. The Washington Attorney General has automatic investigative authority; there's no separate threshold for AG notification. MHMD's breach scope covers consumer health data defined very broadly: mental health, reproductive health, genetic, substance use, and biometric data. The 2025 AG rulemaking on vendor and processor obligations means your downstream service providers carry independent notification duties — a vendor breach can trigger your liability even if your systems were unaffected. Washington's enforcement profile has been aggressive: AG Bob Ferguson's office issued multiple cease-and-desist letters in 2024–2025, with reproductive health apps, mental health platforms, and telehealth vendors as primary targets. Your cyber policy's breach response coverage funds the forensics, breach counsel, notification production, and call center work; the regulatory defense covers AG response. We review both layers against MHMD's no-cure-period reality before binding.

Regulatory Snapshot

Cyber & Privacy Requirements in Washington

Below is a snapshot of the most relevant cyber and privacy requirements businesses in Washington should be aware of. This isn't legal advice — it's the regulatory exposure framework we review against during the consultative coverage check.

1

Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA)

Effective March 2024. Applies broadly to any entity processing "consumer health data" — not limited to HIPAA-covered entities. Covers wellness apps, fitness trackers, mental-health platforms, reproductive-health operators, and more.

2

MHMDA Consent & Geofencing Restrictions

Requires explicit consent for collection or sharing of consumer health data; prohibits geofencing around healthcare facilities; grants a private right of action under the Washington Consumer Protection Act.

3

Washington Breach Notification (RCW 19.255)

Notification required within 30 days of discovery of a breach involving Washington residents. AG notice required for breaches affecting 500+ residents.

4

HIPAA Security & Breach Notification Rules

Apply to covered entities and business associates; require administrative, physical, and technical safeguards plus federal notification timelines.

5

GLBA Safeguards Rule

Financial institutions must maintain risk-based information security programs, incident-response plans, and customer-data safeguards.

6

FTC Act §5 + FTC Safeguards Rule

FTC enforcement exposure for deceptive privacy practices; financial institutions face Safeguards Rule incident-response, encryption, and risk-assessment duties.

7

PCI DSS v4.0

Payment processors must maintain network security, encryption, access controls, and incident response capabilities; warranted by most cyber carriers.

8

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rule

Public companies — particularly relevant in the Seattle tech corridor — must disclose material cybersecurity incidents within 4 business days and describe risk-management governance annually.

9

Vendor & Data Processor Contracting

MHMDA imposes consent flow-downs to processors; BAAs required for healthcare; vendor agreements must allocate breach-notification responsibility and indemnification.

Next Step

Not sure which of these apply to your business?

We map your data footprint, vendor stack, and customer geography against current regulatory exposure during the consultative coverage check — before quoting, before binding. So you know which of these frameworks affect your real exposure, and which don't.

Local

Cities We Serve in Washington

We write cyber insurance for Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma, and businesses across Washington.

Seattle, WASpokane, WATacoma, WAVancouver, WABellevue, WAKent, WAEverett, WARenton, WAFederal Way, WASpokane Valley, WA

National Footprint

Cyber Insurance in All 29 Cyber States

We write cyber insurance across 29 states. Select a state to learn about local privacy regulations, breach notification windows, and coverage options.

Nearby

Cyber Insurance in Nearby States

We write cyber insurance across 29 states. Explore coverage in nearby states where we're licensed.

Two professionals in modern business setting reviewing cyber coverage documents

Ready When You Are

Ready When You Are

We compare carriers, review your data profile, and walk you through every option for Washington cyber coverage.

Get a Cyber Policy Review →

Takes ~2 minutes · We review your requirements · Coverage matched to your contracts