Loss of Rents Coverage: Why Every Landlord Needs It

The $40,000 Gap

A commercial landlord in Fort Worth, Texas owned a small strip center with four tenant spaces. One of the tenants was a Vietnamese restaurant. In November 2024, a grease fire started in the kitchen exhaust system and caused significant damage to the unit — charred walls, melted electrical, smoke damage throughout.

The landlord’s property insurance kicked in and covered the $85,000 in building repairs. But here’s what it didn’t cover: the five months of lost rent while the space was being rebuilt. At $8,000/month, that’s $40,000 in rental income that came straight out of the landlord’s pocket.

And the mortgage didn’t pause. The property taxes didn’t pause. The landlord was still making payments on a unit generating zero revenue for nearly half a year.

All of that could’ve been avoided with loss of rents coverage — a coverage that would’ve cost him roughly $500/year.

What Loss of Rents Actually Covers

Loss of rents coverage — sometimes called rental income coverage or business income coverage on a lessors risk policy — reimburses you for the rental income you lose when a covered event makes a tenant space unoccupiable.

Covered events typically include:

Fire and smoke damage. The most common trigger. Whether it’s a kitchen fire, electrical fire, or arson, if the space can’t be occupied during repairs, your lost rent is covered.

Water damage. Burst pipes, roof leaks during a storm, or sprinkler system malfunctions that make a space unusable.

Wind and hail damage. Severe storms that damage the roof or structure enough to require the tenant to vacate during repairs.

Vandalism. Break-ins or vandalism that render the space unoccupiable.

What it doesn’t cover: a tenant who just stops paying rent (that’s an eviction issue, not an insurance issue), or damage caused by the tenant themselves (that’s typically on their renter’s insurance or commercial policy).

How the Coverage Works in Practice

Let’s walk through the math on a real scenario. Say you own a retail space leased at $6,500/month. A burst pipe during a winter freeze floods the unit, destroying drywall, flooring, and electrical systems. The space is uninhabitable for four months during repairs.

Item	Without Loss of Rents	With Loss of Rents
Building repair cost	Covered by property policy	Covered by property policy
Lost rent (4 months × $6,500)	$26,000 — out of pocket	$26,000 — covered by policy
Mortgage payments during vacancy	Still due — you pay	Still due — but rental income is replaced
Annual cost of coverage	$0	$300–$600
Net cost to landlord	$26,000+	$300–$600/year

The coverage limit is usually set at 12 months of gross rental income. So if your space rents for $8,000/month, you’d carry $96,000 in loss of rents coverage. Most claims resolve in 2–6 months, well within that limit.

And the waiting period is typically 72 hours. Meaning the clock starts three days after the covered event. For any loss lasting longer than a week or two, that 72-hour deductible is negligible.

What Loss of Rents Coverage Costs

Here’s the thing. Loss of rents coverage is absurdly cheap relative to the exposure it covers. For most commercial landlords, you’re looking at:

$300–$800/year for a single tenant space renting for $3,000–$10,000/month.

That’s $25–$67/month to protect against tens of thousands of dollars in lost income. It’s often included as part of a lessors risk or commercial property policy — sometimes you just need to make sure the limit is set correctly.

For multi-tenant properties, the cost scales with total rental income exposure. A landlord with four units generating $30,000/month in total rent might pay $1,200–$2,500/year for loss of rents coverage across all units.

I’ll say it plainly: there’s no good reason not to carry this coverage. The premium-to-risk ratio is one of the best in all of commercial insurance.

Common Mistakes Landlords Make

Not carrying it at all. This is the most common mistake. Many landlords buy a basic property policy that covers the building but doesn’t include loss of rents. They don’t realize the gap until a claim happens.

Setting the limit too low. If your space rents for $10,000/month and you only carry $48,000 in loss of rents (4.8 months), but the repair takes 7 months, you’re covering the last 2+ months yourself. Set the limit at 12 months of gross rent to be safe.

Forgetting to update the limit after rent increases. You raised rent from $5,000 to $7,500/month two years ago, but your loss of rents limit still reflects the old rent. If a claim happens, you’ll be reimbursed based on the old number unless you’ve updated the policy.

Confusing loss of rents with tenant’s business income. Your loss of rents coverage protects YOUR rental income. It doesn’t cover your tenant’s lost business revenue — they need their own business income coverage on their commercial policy. Make sure your lease requires tenants to carry their own coverage.

Check out our Landlord Insurance Gaps Guide for more blind spots we see regularly.

Get Your Landlord Insurance Quote

If you own commercial rental property and you’re not sure whether you have loss of rents coverage — or whether your limits are set correctly — we’ll review it for free. And if your current policy is overpriced or underbuilt, we’ll re-quote it against 30+ carriers.

Learn more about lessors risk insurance →

Or use our Landlord Insurance Calculator to get a quick estimate of what your property should cost to insure.

Bobby Friel is the founder of Direct Insurance Services, specializing in commercial insurance for contractors, HOAs, restaurants, and commercial landlords across 29 states. He’s insured everything from single-unit retail spaces to 40-unit office complexes, and he’s seen too many landlords learn about loss of rents coverage the hard way.